Karl Fife wrote: > Anybody care to muse on Wi-SIP vs. SIP-DECT? > > My limited research indicates that none of the WiSip phones will ever be > able to match the performance of DECT phones. Maybe I'm wrong but a > Wi-SIP phone seems like a DIESEL sports car.
Just for fun! http://www.cumminsracing.com/ Rod -- > There is nothing wrong with the technology, but it seems like a > shoe-horned fit into the requirements of a wireless endpoint. DECT > uses a wireless radio layer that was engineered from the ground-up > with the design priorities of a wireless endpoit. > > I notice that the standby times of Wi-SIP vs. SIP-DECT are a great > illustration of this point. I guess there's no low-power way to > participate in a WiFi network, hense standby battery life that sucks in > Wi-SIP. > > I've never actually demoed a Wi-SIP phone on premesis, but if the range > of my WiFi LAPTOP vs. my DECT 6.0 headset is any indication, (DECT more > than double the range) I'd guess it to be quite hard to make a case for > Wi-SIP unless you're doing some straight-up network application > integration right onto the phone. Can anyone speak to this? > > -Karl > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona > Register Now: http://www.astricon.net > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
