Steve Davies wrote: > In fact the current behaviour makes perfect sense as it results in > last-minute transcoding, and utilises the fact that Asterisk may know > better about the capabilities of an onward link than the originator's > phone! By specifying g729/ilbc, you are saying that g729 is better on > that link, so Asterisk tries to be helpful - If ilbc is better, > specify ilbc/g729 instead :)
As it is supposed to work today, when creating the outbound channels, if the format being used by the incoming channel is available on the outbound channel, that format is supposed to be brought to the top of the list (made first priority), so that we can minimize the need to transcode. If this is not happening, then please open a bug report on bugs.digium.com, with the details that are needed (Asterisk version, console log trace, 'sip debug' or packet capture, etc.). -- Kevin P. Fleming Director of Software Technologies Digium, Inc. - "The Genuine Asterisk Experience" (TM) _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
