Octavio Ruiz wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Richard Lyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Octavio Ruiz wrote: >> > > >>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Shariq Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The output of a >>> CLI> pri intese debug >>> at Asterisk CLI before make a test call would be very useful, libPRI >>> 1.4.7 is just fine. >>> > > >> I am amazed no one else have suggested trying a different phone type >> like an IAX2 softphone. (if i am right, this will work) >> > > For me is complete clear that > > -- Zap/1-1 is circuit-busy > -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' > == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/1/0) > > the Zap channel is the one which returns the congestion status, not > the other leg (whatever the technology is). > Anyway, if he try both options nobody is going to be hurt. > > I forgot completely mention (and carefully read their zaptel.conf > configuration and see dchan=16 declared rather than hardhdlc=16 ) > that probably their issue is already solved and documented just right > here: http://wiki.sangoma.com/Asterisk-FAQ#hardhdlc Shariq, can you > tell us your wanrouter + zaptel version? > > If i remember correctly you also had a Zap/1 PROGRESS and PROCEEDING message just above this where it said 'passing to SIP/xxx'.
So, that means it wasn't the Zap side that caused the drop. Please, just do the test with an IAX2 softphone. It is *only* a test! _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
