On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:05:06 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote: >> >There is no error in RFC3551. There is a clear statement that an earlier >RFC did things wrong, due to a typo, and classifying G.722 as an 8000 >sample/second codec is, for better or worse, the standard. Its messy and >inconsistent, but its "the standard". > >The only manufacturers I know of who do the wrong thing (i.e. using >16000 in the SDP) are Grandstream and Aastra. Both are aware that their >products are incompatible with the rest of the universe, but seem >uninterested in fixing them. > >If I were building a terminal, I'd make mine announce 8000, but accept >8000 or 16000 to try to maximise compatibility. It seems people don't do >that. > >Unless you have some special version of eyebeam, I don't think it >supports G.722. It supports G.722.2, but that is completely different. >It also supports 16 bit PCM and DVI4 at 16000 samples/second. >
No, it's the OEM version which I got from ZipDX. The version that Counterpath sells direct to end-users does not have the same selection of codecs as the OEM version. You can see the codec list in the following image from the audio cod dialogue. http://www.mgraves.org/voip/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/eyebeamcodecs.png Are 16 bit PCM and DVI14 supported by any hard phones? Michael -- Michael Graves mgraves<at>mstvp.com http://blog.mgraves.org o713-861-4005 c713-201-1262 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] skype mjgraves fwd 54245 _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
