Go for it. ztdummy is not an issue. I have used ztdummy with 220 simultaneous participants in 18 different conference groups. At one time, I had 60 machines running simultaneously in a FARM all of which were carrying the same 18 conference groups with over 200 participants active on each machine. ..mike..
At 11:23 AM 9/28/2008, Gordon Henderson wrote: >On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Jim Boykin wrote: > > > We plan to use asterisk for conferencing. As I understand, it requires > > either a separate hardware like x100p clone or ztdummy. What are the > > pro & cons of x100p vs ztdummy. Any other hardware suggestions for > > conferencing? It should be able to handle few simultaneous > > conferences. > >I have one server which handles "a few simultaneous conferences" using >just ztdummy - however there are rarely more than 4-5 participants and >rarely more than 2 conferences on the go at any one time.. (2.5GHz AMD >Semperon FWIW) > >Ztdummy using: > > >ztdummy: Trying to load High Resolution Timer >ztdummy: Initialized High Resolution Timer >ztdummy: Starting High Resolution Timer >ztdummy: High Resolution Timer started, good to go > >And zttest gets more 100%'s than not. > >Gordon > >_______________________________________________ >-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > >AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona >Register Now: http://www.astricon.net > >asterisk-users mailing list >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
