On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 19:05 -0400, Alex Balashov wrote: > Does anyone have any perspective on how well Asterisk performs and > scales inside a Xen hypervisor environment? > > Obviously, the answer depends largely on what sort of hardware it's > running on, whether it's in PAE mode, whether it's a newer CPU that has > some paravirtualisation instruction sets available to assist it, how > much memory is allocated to each VM, and other architectural > considerations. > > Any perspective would be helpful, however. > We have been doing some test. To avoid single point of failure (as musch as possible) we had mysql, ldap and asterisk14 and asterisk16 in separate virtual machines. No problem what so ever. DOM-u's are easy to scale up, considering mem or cpu. Would suggest to have either channel-banks/ata's or PRI-boards in a separate machine(s). never got the pci forwarding from a hypervisor to a dom-U properly working
Hans _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
