On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:53:33PM +0200, Hans Witvliet wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 17:37 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
> > I have done this. Why BRIs exist in the US is beyond me.
> Much of the idea's behind ISDN are hopelesly outdated, except for one:
BRI is actually ISDN BRI. PRI is ISDN PRI. Uses very much the same
concepts, standards, etc. BRI is supported in chan_zap/chan_dahdi
through libpri :-)
In most parts of the world BRI adds some extra layers of complication to
make the CPE units behave a bit more like analog phones (PtMP). In the
US, AFAIK, this is not used.
Again I'll note that I have met very few cases, so I might be wrong.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
