What Hardware? For that performance?
-----Mensaje original----- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Matthew Fredrickson Enviado el: Friday, November 07, 2008 3:18 PM Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 Production ready?? Steve Totaro wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Matthew Fredrickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Sebastian Gutierrez wrote: > > Anyone is using 1.6 in production?? > > > > Is it ready? > > I have a number of people using 1.6 in production doing SS7<->SIP, > SS7<->IAX, and SS7<->ISDN gatewaying. > > One example (doing SS7<->IAX): > > System uptime: 10 weeks, 6 days, 21 hours, 35 minutes, 45 seconds > > 8617029 calls processed > > --- > Matthew Fredrickson > Digium, Inc. > > > EEEK IAX!! Do you use IAX for a reason? Is it because Asterisk does > not setup SIP calls very well? Just curious. The customer chose to use IAX. It has been working very well for him. > Impressive, but very purpose specific. Do you only load a couple of > modules? Full suite of modules, although it is not using most of them. I did specifically mention in the original message that it was primarily being used as a gateway machine. > I think the question was more along the lines of what Asterisk was meant > to be, a feature rich PBX. Maybe.. or maybe not. In any case, this is some specific data that someone can use about 1.6's performance. Matthew Fredrickson Digium, Inc. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
