On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Karl Fife <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Asterisk 1.6, there is an option to use the 'new g.711 algorithm'. > "Use the NEW ulaw/alaw codec's (slower, but cleaner)" > > By slower does this mean more 'expensive', or does it instead mean that > there will be more algorithmic latency? Both? Can anyone speak to the > relative increases? > > With regard to accuracy, can anyone speak to what kind of situation might > demonstrate the benefit of the new algorithm? i.e. transcoding, SpanDSP, > Analog interfaces (DAHDI) etc. > > Thanks > Karl > > > Interesting.... Alaw and Ulaw algorithms slower and cleaner? Slower would imply problems with FAX or whatever. Not sure how uncompressed audio could be cleaner and why on earth one would want it slower? What's next? The new, improved, under new management, SLIN? PS, I am sure (75% anyways) that this new algorithm is good for something..... -- Thanks, Steve Totaro +18887771888 (Toll Free) +12409381212 (Cell) +12024369784 (Skype)
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
