mail-lists wrote: > Alex Balashov wrote: >> mail-lists wrote: >>> Steve, >>> >>> Hijacking this post here - How 'good' is freeswitch currently. I'm >>> looking for some sort of SIP proxy and have looked into openser and ser. >>> Freeswitch seems to have more functionality than these and it seems a >>> lot easier to configure. I particularly like the xml config files, etc. >> What do you mean by functionality? Are you looking for low-level or >> high-level functionality? > > I guess I mean FS has more high level functionality like conference > rooms and voicemail modules which might allow us to offload some of this > from *. OpenSER has some of this as well I think. I'm not sure FS lets > you interact directly with the SIP stack like OpenSER/SER does though (I > might be completely wrong about this)
No, OpenSER doesn't have any of this functionality. OpenSER is not a user agent of any kind and has no features relevant to the user experience as such. It only serves the low-level part of this formula. -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
