On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:24:56 you wrote: > One of the problems you'll run into is that in larger countries like the > US, and/or countries with greater amounts of telecom interconnection, > competition and deregulation, this information cannot be reduced simply > to a convenient algorithm. > > The North American Numbering Plan (www.nanpa.com) does provide some > basic standards for valid numbers, but aside from that, there exists no > special numerological distinction between incumbent and competitive, > fixed-line and mobile, or VoIP, and extensive number portability throws > even more complexity into the mix. > > I'm not saying it can't be done - just be aware that the undertaking > you're proposing is very complicated, and the information would come > from innumerable data sources (a great deal of them commercial and > expensive) and a bewilderingly overlapping array of standards bodies.
Yes, but calls to the USA and Canada landline/cellular cost the same. I need as many countries in the list that I can get info on because in many cases cellular calls and landline calls are priced differently and I need to make routing distinctions in my dial plan. Yes you are correct, Australia and New Zealand are an easy plan. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
