-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

[email protected] wrote:
> Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of asterisk-users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. UDPTL setup (Michael)
>    2. Re: Follow up on parking (Mike)
>    3. Re: Zaptel / TDM400P card stopped working (Tilghman Lesher)
>    4. Re: Variables for dial plan (Steve Johnson)
>    5. Re: MeetMe echo problems with more than two     participants
>       (Matthew J. Roth)
>    6. Re: Follow up on parking (Danny Nicholas)
>    7. Re: Follow up on parking (David fire)
>    8. Re: 1.6.1: iax trunk needs "dahdi timing" ?? (Russell Bryant)
>    9. Re: Follow up on parking (Terry Wilson)
>   10. D-channel errors and Channelbanks (Justin Phelps)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:38:57 +1300
> From: Michael <[email protected]>
> Subject: [asterisk-users] UDPTL setup
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="us-ascii"
> 
> This setting here-
> 
> ; UDPTL start and UDPTL end configure start and end addresses
> ;
> udptlstart=4000
> udptlend=4999
> 
> Does this need to be allowed on incoming or outgoing firewall rulesets of the 
> machine running Asterisk?
> 
> Thanks in anticipation,
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:05:25 -0500
> From: Mike <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
>       <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <000001c95eb5$cbfb10d0$63f132...@ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Just so I'm clear: there is no way to do what I want short of playing with
> the underlying code, correct?
> 
>  
> 
> Mike
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Danny Nicholas
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 15:31
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
> 
>  
> 
> After some research, it seems that asterisk builds a dynamic context called
> [park-dial] and puts a callback for the parker into line 1, so this would
> have to be a patch/workaround.
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 12:40 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
> 
>  
> 
> Danny,
> 
>  
> 
> I've been starring at features.conf since yesterday AM, and I do realize
> there is an example that looks close to what I want, but the same thing
> typed in my own dialplan doesn't work.
> 
>  
> 
> All I want, for the sake of discussion, is to Hangup() when the call gets
> out of parking after the 45 second timeout.
> 
>  
> 
> As for show application park, this is not helping.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Mike
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Danny Nicholas
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 9:26
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
> 
>  
> 
> You should try these steps
> 
> 1.    core show application park from the CLI interface
> 2.    look at features.conf
> 3.    one of these should offer the hint you seek
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:46 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: [asterisk-users] Follow up on parking
> 
>  
> 
> I`m having (a lot of) trouble changing the call parking timeout behavior.
> 
>  
> 
> This is my SIP context?
> 
>  
> 
> [internal-local-only-hamel]
> 
> exten => s,1,Hangup
> 
> include => parkedcalls
> 
>  
> 
> What I am trying to accomppish is a quick test where I park a call, wait 45
> seconds, and it hangs up.
> 
>  
> 
> Here is my execution in the CLI:
> 
>  
> 
> == Parked SIP/0004f2134384-1-0943e8a0 on 1...@parkedcalls. Will timeout back
> to extension [internal-local-only-hamel] s, 1 in 15 seconds
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Seems like this will work?until it doesn't.  The s,1 extension is never
> executed, instead park-dial() is called.
> 
>  
> 
> What am I missing?
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Mike
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081215/6c29a35e/attachment-0001.htm
>  
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:16:06 -0600
> From: Tilghman Lesher <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel / TDM400P card stopped working
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>       <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> On Monday 15 December 2008 00:57:08 Langdon Stevenson wrote:
>> Hi Paul
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.  I have removed and re-installed all of the Fedora
>> Zaptel packages with Yum.  I have the following installed:
>>
>>    asterisk-zaptel       1.4.12.1-1.fc8
>>    zaptel.i386           1.4.12.1-1.fc8
>>    zaptel-devel.i386     1.4.12.1-1.fc8
>>    zaptel-lib.i386       1.4.12.1-1.fc8
>>    zaptel-utils.i386     1.4.12.1-1.fc8
>>
>>
>> The command:
>>
>>    modprobe wctdm
>>
>> produces:
>>
>>    FATAL: Module wctdm not found.
> 
> This probably means that the modules were compiled for a kernel other
> than the one you have installed.  You probably have multiple directories
> within /lib/modules, and the zaptel modules are in a directory other than
> what is listed with 'uname -r'.  In this case, compiling from source is
> probably your best bet.
> 


I just realized I did something very silly by not giving an asterisk
version or OS version.

Connected to Asterisk 1.2.24

# cat /etc/issue
CentOS release 4.4 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m

- --
Regards,

Justin Phelps
IT Director
Eye Center of North Florida
850.522.7952 - Office
850.522.9829 - Fax
850.832.0249 - Cell
www.eyecarenow.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAklG0sIACgkQfV4idVrZqT/GVwCeMibhFlqb/+H/nlIpqiXu++Pn
X8IAoJa0+sCDGwFjt/DjWvE4NqF9ReAH
=Pz1z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to