Hello Andrew, 2008/12/17 Andrew Thomas <[email protected]>
> If you are connecting to BRI lines then you should be TE - not NT. Yes of course, you're right. I was mostly referring to this : ISDN ------<BRI> ---- asterisk -----<BRI>----- legacy PBX Then, in this case, as legacy PBX has a set of TE-PtmP or TE-PtP interfaces, asterisk box should also include such NT-PtP or NT-PtmP interfaces. For instance, would you say that in the UK, most PBXes are using TE-PtP ? > > > You can run as TE ptp or ptmp with mISDN (not sure about DAHDI yet - not > tried the new release). > > HTH > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Olivier > Sent: 17 December 2008 08:14 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: [asterisk-users] libpri and NT-Point to multi-point > > Hi, > > At the moment, libpri /w Asterisk 1.6, Dahdi 2.1, is not supporting > NT-Point to multi-point mode. > Here (France), most small PBXes are connected to ISDN through BRI trunks in > PtmP (don't know why but it seems the general case). > So this NT-PtmP function would be very helpful to easily slide an Asterisk > box between an existing PBX and the network. > > Does the same case apply elsewhere (UK, Germany, Italy, ...) ? > Do you think this is needed ? > > Regards > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
