On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 19:26 +0200, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote: > Steve Murphy wrote: > > Hello! ... > Hi, > > The specs look very promising. I think everyone > here should be grateful for your efforts. In answer to your > question I personally find both approaches very useful, although > I would prefer to see the "simple" approach implemented first > chronologically since I believe it is simpler to implement and we > could > get immediate results. > One small question. I tried finding the "peeraccount" variable > that > was brought up many times in past emails in your CDRs fields > descriptions > but I couldn't. This field was supposed to hold the accountcode for > the terminating side > (and could be set for each channel using CHANNEL()) according to > this : > > http://www.venturevoip.com/print.php?rssid=2011 > > Is this field going to be implemented?
Yes, it will. I apologize for that omission. I will correct the CDRfix2.rfc.txt file, so it properly mentions this var. (small wait, while I go do it). There, now, rev 168504 of that doc contains peeraccount in both the Simple and Leg-Based sections. User modifiable, with a little verbage as to how. Thanks for catching that, btw!! murf -- Steve Murphy <[email protected]> Digium
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
