> > >> BRI is stupid in the US anyways, that is why it was never supported or >> proper stack written (with the exception of Marcin's). BRI was a >> miscarriage in the US and it will probably disappear in the near >> future. >> > > Okay, great! Why didn't you just reply with that to begin? Seriously...? '-) > > Look, this confirms what I'd pretty much concluded already. All I wanted to > know. Now I can stop trying to find out what the deal is, you see. > > . . . > > Truly, I thought getting a public recommendation to contact someone who > already hadn't passed the "please don't taint my GNU/Linux and open source" > machine test, was, well, funny... okay? > > I found it *particularly* funny as you didn't address the part of my post > where I want to know if it's common to, well... you can call it what you want > with borrowing, and keeping modified, open source code (if that's what > happened)... for me, I'm *not* a capitalist, but I do understand the effect > on open source when folks do that. ;-) > > >> Just get a partial PRI, POTS, or a some DSL lines. >> > > Partial PRI is also disappearing, I've been told -- though now I'll have to > try harder to find it since I don't need any bandwidth, but would like > digital lines. POTS will likely have to do after all. > Well maybe if there was a decently supported piece of hardware that actually worked in North America, enough people on this list would actually see the benefits of BRI where T1/PRI is just not the right fit for the situation, and there would be a demand and it would become more well known and not disappear, .....
I agree though, if nothing changes it will go away before too long. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
