On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:48:37PM +0700, reza adinata wrote:
> On 2/17/09, Tzafrir Cohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:27:39PM +0700, reza adinata wrote:
> >> asterisk:/usr/src/zaptel-1.2.27# uname -r
> >> 2.6.18-6-486
> >>
> >>
> >> doesn't that mean that I have already got the precise version in my
> >> box? (uname - r-kernel-release print the kernel release) ? why do I
> >> have to install the same kernel?
> >
> > Here's a sanity check for you: can your system build the module zaptel?
> >
> > aptitude install zaptel-source
> > m-a prepare
> > m-a build zaptel
> >
> > Those commands will not install that version of Zaptel, and hence you
> > should not worry about version collisions.
>
> Yes, it is indeed working. I am currently using a debian4r5, and i can
> install using aptitude
I have not asked about installing pre-built packages. I asked you to
test-build the zaptel source from zaptel-source . If it builds, you
should have working kernel headers.
> The problem is that I am trying to install an asterisk mp3player using
> mpg123 that is capable of playing from .pls. And in some literatures I
> have read, it is mentioned that I should have the newest asterisk, and
> the newest mpg123.. and a similar problem occured when I installed the
> newest asterisk using a source .. (inappropriate kernel) :(
Is the problem lack of a timing source?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[email protected]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[email protected]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[email protected]/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
