You sure you don't have a pony tail? :) Hehe.
It happens to the best of us. Hopefully after my fine tuning it will happen to less of us! ________________________________ From: Darren Wiebe <[email protected]> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 4:13:46 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Please help test the gender detection module at 575-613-4392 Pretty cool. I'm almost offended though as I'm not usually guessed as a female of the species. :) Darren Wiebe [email protected] Asterisk Asterisk wrote: > Steve, > > >Tried to test and got "call could not be completed as dialed". > > Were you able to connect? If not, please try again. Call volume has > been growing. > > >How about a moving stress variable that could be used as a lie > detector of sorts or > >just to measure how certain parts of a script, or certain questions may > > This is possible. Do you want to call or e-mail to discuss? > > >I guess to get a baseline, you would have to ask a few inert questions. > > Yes, I definitely need to do this and will probably add this in for > the next release. > > Justin Newman > nt_jnewman at yahoo.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Steve Totaro <[email protected]> > *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 18, 2009 10:57:47 AM > *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Please help test the gender detection > module at 575-613-4392 > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Steve Totaro > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Asterisk Asterisk > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > This module detects gender and approximate age range. I'm > working on getting it's accuracy to 80%+ on a consistent > basis, after implementing filters to remove background noise > and other artifacts. > > It's designed for a number of things. To start, I have several > clients (primarily mobile content and servers providers) that > want to profile and generate demographics of their users for > selling advertising. They also want to understand their user > base. Plus, some customers have found that male and female > users tend to respond differently to different prompts, flows, > etc. This helps in designing a system that meets needs of many > different types of users. > > Of course, there are many other uses and I'm sure people can > generate some cool ideas. > > Let me know how it works when you try the test number at > 575-613-4392. Also, let me know if you have any interest in > the module. > > Justin > > nt_jnewman at yahoo.com <http://yahoo.com> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Ron Joffe <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > *To:* [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > *Cc:* Asterisk Asterisk <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2009 11:05:24 AM > *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Please help test the gender > detection module at 575-613-4392 > > That's an interesting module. > > Care to elaborate on what you designed it for ? > > Thanks, > > Ron > > > > > On Monday 16 February 2009 13:29, Asterisk Asterisk wrote: > > I need your help: please help test the gender detection > module at > > 575-613-4392. > > > > I wrote a gender detection module and thought I'd try it > out. It only takes > > a second. I've been showing 90%+ accuracy and I want to make > sure it's > > working correctly. Rain and significant background noise > seems to throw it > > off, so I still have a bit of work to do. > > > > Have your friends and significant others call too. Also, let > me know if you > > have any need for the module. > > > > Justin Newman > > nt_jnewman at yahoo.com <http://yahoo.com> > > > Tried to test and got "call could not be completed as dialed". > > This sounds very interesting Justin. > > -- > Thanks, > Steve Totaro > > > Justin, how about building some additional functionality. > > How about a moving stress variable that could be used as a lie > detector of sorts or just to measure how certain parts of a script, or > certain questions may prove to be more stressful where simply > rewording them may have a less stressful response? > > I guess to get a baseline, you would have to ask a few inert questions. > > -- > Thanks, > Steve Totaro > +18887771888 (Toll Free) > +12409381212 (Cell) > +12024369784 (Skype) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Darren Wiebe [email protected] Aleph Communications www.aleph-com.net _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
