On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:24:55 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 07:04:42PM +0100, Christian Stredicke wrote: >> To be honest: I am not very optimistic regarding this project. >> >> The WRT is really a case where you essentially use stuff that is >> already available and which is very very stable (e.g. Linux). There is >> nothing really special for the WRT. >> >> For a phone, the picture looks different. There are so many components >> necessary that are either not available or not very stable. > >Hence my focus on small quantities and hackability.
OK, but there is the basis for something interesting here. If there's sufficient documentation to expose the hardware functionality then the device could be a suitable platform. That implies a certain level of cooperation from the manufacturer. It might be a lot of work, but that just means that someone with the right skillset and determination would need to be the project lead. Or it could end up lame or incomplete, like most of the soft phones that I've tried. Michael -- Michael Graves mgraves<at>mstvp.com http://blog.mgraves.org o713-861-4005 c713-201-1262 sip:[email protected] skype mjgraves fwd 54245 _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
