Marco Signorini wrote: > Hi Gordon, thank you for your answer. > > It's not mandatory to use an external box to handle the PRI. I was > thinking to use a Patton device instead of a TE120P just because I would > like to be able to switch to T38 in the near future or if working with > inband faxes will reveal problems. > I'm open to any suggestion, being in the initial requirements analysis > stage. > > External devices, also, let me able to select a server independently by > the PCI, PCIXpress or any other connectors will be ready in the future, > maximizing the customer investment... but this could be the less > interesting part. > > Thank you to All People answered me on this subject. > Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today > problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong? > What about other solutions? > I'm not sure where you got that idea. Most comments about iaxmodem + HylaFAX are very positive. It does, of course, require a reliable connection between iaxmodem and the PSTN, but most people set these things up in a reasonably well controlled environment. There are some notes at http://www.soft-switch.org/spandsp-soft-fax-performance.html about the results of serious real world volume testing of iaxmodem.
Regards, Steve _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users