This is what you show CBeyond. You have some vouchers there from CBeyond that will allow me to get paid from them not you.
Chuck Coleman President CCI Technologies/CC Call Center/CSI Technologies Director of Managed Services for Gurus2go Cell 510-439-6501 Confidential Email: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Please also note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the CSI Technologies, Inc.. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:00 To: [email protected] Subject: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 56, Issue 23 Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of asterisk-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: problem with an agi in PHP (BERGANZ Fran?ois) 2. Re: Making use of SIP "making progress" messages (Olle E. Johansson) 3. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Marco Signorini) 4. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Doug Lytle) 5. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Lee Howard) 6. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Steve Underwood) 7. Re: Bounty- CDR Bug Fix (Tilghman Lesher) 8. Re: problem with an agi in PHP (Steve Edwards) 9. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Marco Signorini) 10. Re: colorized logfiles in asterisk 1.6.0.6 (Tilghman Lesher) 11. How to install spandsp from source in lenny ? (Olivier) 12. Re: Cdr problem (Tilghman Lesher) 13. Re: Broken Pipe error while using UpdateConfig command (Tilghman Lesher) 14. Re: Faxing success rate on PRI (Marco Signorini) 15. Re: How to install spandsp from source in lenny ? (James Sneeringer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:29:04 +0100 From: BERGANZ Fran?ois <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <006601c9a0c3$66331360$32993a...@net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I am sorry it work ! In fact, I had mistakes in my config? Sorry And thank you for answering? Cordialement, BERGANZ Fran?ois P Pensez ? l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si n?cessaire. De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Danny Nicholas Envoy? : lundi 9 mars 2009 15:07 ? : 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP You didn?t say whether a2billing.php works from the shell. Is it 755 permissioned? _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of BERGANZ Fran?ois Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 8:53 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP I have the same thing with AGI in the dialplan And php is install Cordialement, BERGANZ Fran?ois P Pensez ? l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si n?cessaire. De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Danny Nicholas Envoy? : lundi 9 mars 2009 14:36 ? : 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP The message ?indicates? that DEADAGI will not work and that you should use AGI instead. Are you sure PHP is installed on your machine and functioning properly (from $, php a2billing.php works)? _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of BERGANZ Fran?ois Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 8:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP Hello, I need to execute an agi in php. I have that: == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Executing [0170725...@mnupprx1:1] Answer("SIP/33179977999-b6c18478", "") in new stack -- Executing [0170725...@mnupprx1:2] GotoIf("SIP/33179977999-b6c18478", "0?6:3)") in new stack -- Goto (mnupprx1,0170725000,3) -- Executing [0170725...@mnupprx1:3] DeadAGI("SIP/33179977999-b6c18478", "a2billing.php") in new stack [Mar 9 14:25:08] WARNING[7518]: res_agi.c:3064 deadagi_exec: DeadAGI has been deprecated, please use AGI in all cases! -- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/a2billing.php -- <SIP/33179977999-b6c18478>AGI Script a2billing.php completed, returning 0 -- Executing [0170725...@mnupprx1:4] Wait("SIP/33179977999-b6c18478", "2") in new stack -- Executing [0170725...@mnupprx1:5] Hangup("SIP/33179977999-b6c18478", "") in new stack == Spawn extension (mnupprx1, 0170725000, 5) exited non-zero on 'SIP/33179977999-b6c18478' I dont know why it dont exec it ! Cordialement, BERGANZ Fran?ois P Pensez ? l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si n?cessaire. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090309/ec2f45 e6/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:08:08 +0100 From: "Olle E. Johansson" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Making use of SIP "making progress" messages To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes 6 mar 2009 kl. 13.36 skrev Mikel Lindsaar: > Hi all, > > Is there any way to make use of the SIP making progress messages? > > I find that about the time the SIP peer says "making progress" is the > time the other end actually starts to ring, or is busy etc. > > Before that time, I want to generate an "in progress" tone using > playtones to let the user know that their call is doing something. > > I need to be able to call stop tones once the in progress call is > received. > > Any ideas? show application playback Check the "noanswer" option /O :-) ------ Check our new SIP router class: http://edvina.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:13:17 +0100 From: Marco Signorini <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Gordon, thank you for your answer. It's not mandatory to use an external box to handle the PRI. I was thinking to use a Patton device instead of a TE120P just because I would like to be able to switch to T38 in the near future or if working with inband faxes will reveal problems. I'm open to any suggestion, being in the initial requirements analysis stage. External devices, also, let me able to select a server independently by the PCI, PCIXpress or any other connectors will be ready in the future, maximizing the customer investment... but this could be the less interesting part. Thank you to All People answered me on this subject. Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong? What about other solutions? Thank you and best regards, Marco Signorini ======================= INGEGNI Tech S.r.l. http://www.ingegnitech.com Gordon Henderson wrote: > On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Marco wrote: > > >> Hi List, >> I've been using PSTN-ATA + Asterisk + IAXModem + Hylafax since three years >> on my lab test setup and I appreciate it. Moreover the global quantity of >> fax handled by this setup is not very high. >> >> I'll be involved in a more complex system for a customer and I would like >> to ask to All of you if you have experiences and/or statistical results on >> faxing success and failure rate. >> >> The system I have to deploy will operate in the following context: >> >> - It will be interfaced to an E1 PRI >> - It will be able to send and receive faxes (by e-mail and/or virtual >> printers) >> - It will be able to send faxes from a normal fax machine. >> >> The system will be placed on the same building, i.e. only private ethernet >> trunks. >> >> I'm thinking to this type of solution: >> - Patton external unit for E1 >> > > Out of curiosity, why an external box rather than something like a TE120P > PCI card? > > > >> - Asterisk 1.4 + IAXModem + Hylafax >> - An external ATA for the fax machine >> but I'm open to any other possible solution (I'm thinking to have a >> demodulation on Patton and talk T38 with Asterisk 1.6). >> > > Personally, I think you're adding complexity and can't see why that would > be better than an on-board PRI card... > > Gordon > ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:28:58 -0400 From: Doug Lytle <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Marco Signorini wrote: > Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today > problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong? > I would strongly disagree with this statement. I'm running 3 systems. All 3 are PRI/iaxmodem/HylaFAX+. I may see a failure maybe once every other month. Usually it's because the end user has cancelled. We average around 180 faxes a day Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:49:23 -0700 From: Lee Howard <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Marco Signorini wrote: > Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today > problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong? A single server that I administer, receiving 12,000 pages and sending 1,000 pages daily would seem to contradict your conclusions. Thanks, Lee. ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:57:44 +0800 From: Steve Underwood <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Marco Signorini wrote: > Hi Gordon, thank you for your answer. > > It's not mandatory to use an external box to handle the PRI. I was > thinking to use a Patton device instead of a TE120P just because I would > like to be able to switch to T38 in the near future or if working with > inband faxes will reveal problems. > I'm open to any suggestion, being in the initial requirements analysis > stage. > > External devices, also, let me able to select a server independently by > the PCI, PCIXpress or any other connectors will be ready in the future, > maximizing the customer investment... but this could be the less > interesting part. > > Thank you to All People answered me on this subject. > Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today > problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong? > What about other solutions? > I'm not sure where you got that idea. Most comments about iaxmodem + HylaFAX are very positive. It does, of course, require a reliable connection between iaxmodem and the PSTN, but most people set these things up in a reasonably well controlled environment. There are some notes at http://www.soft-switch.org/spandsp-soft-fax-performance.html about the results of serious real world volume testing of iaxmodem. Regards, Steve ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:00:46 -0500 From: Tilghman Lesher <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Bounty- CDR Bug Fix To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Friday 06 March 2009 06:26:13 am Robert Broyles wrote: > Great backports! :-) > > This should really be merged into 1.4. This would violate the release policy for 1.4. -- Tilghman ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:08:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Steve Edwards <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] problem with an agi in PHP To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-unknown" On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: > The message ?indicates? that DEADAGI will not work and that you should use > AGI instead. >From Wikipedia, deprecated means: "In computer software standards and documentation, the term deprecation is applied to software features that are superseded and should be avoided. Although deprecated features remain in the current version, their use may raise warning messages recommending alternate practices, and deprecation may indicate that the feature will be removed in the future. Features are deprecated.rather than being removed.in order to provide backward compatibility and give programmers using the feature time to bring their code into compliance with the new standard." Not "will not work." Thanks in advance, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Steve Edwards [email protected] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:08:28 +0100 From: Marco Signorini <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Doug and Lee, your testimonials are changing my opinion :-) Can you provide some details about your setup? What PRI solution are you using? And what version of Asterisk, IAXModem, SpanDSP? Thank you and best regards, Marco Signorini ======================= INGEGNI Tech S.r.l. http://www.ingegnitech.com Lee Howard wrote: > Marco Signorini wrote: > >> Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today >> problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong? >> > > A single server that I administer, receiving 12,000 pages and sending > 1,000 pages daily would seem to contradict your conclusions. > > Thanks, > > Lee. > ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:10:43 -0500 From: Tilghman Lesher <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] colorized logfiles in asterisk 1.6.0.6 To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Friday 06 March 2009 09:39:30 am Johann Steinwendtner wrote: > Sorry, that I wasn't clear enough. The logfiles contains escape codes + > the colour codes. > e.g.: > [Feb 12 13:38:30] VERBOSE[19816] logger.c: == Registered custom function > 'ESC[1;36;40mSQL_ESCESC[0;37;40m' [Feb 12 13:38:30] VERBOSE[19816] > logger.c: func_odbc.so => (ESC[33;40mODBC lookupsESC[0;37;40m) [Feb 12 > 13:38:30] VERBOSE[19816] logger.c: == Registered application > 'ESC[1;36;40mReadFileESC[0;37;40m' You're correct, but only for VERBOSE lines. The other log levels do not contain color codes. This is more of a consequence of verbose messages getting colorized prior to output than anything else, and as pointed out before, this is not unique to 1.6.0. Given that the VERBOSE level is so, well, verbose, most people do not enable that log level in production, but turn it on only for debugging purposes. -- Tilghman ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:13:09 +0100 From: Olivier <[email protected]> Subject: [asterisk-users] How to install spandsp from source in lenny ? To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, I'm trying to install spandsp from source in a Debian Lenny system. I did : cd /usr/src wget http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.6pre5.tgz tar xvf spandsp-0.0.6pre5.tgz cd spandsp-0.0.6 ./configure make make install When doing this, spandsp warns me that librairies are installed in /usr/local/lib with this message : "Libraries have been installed in: /usr/local/lib If you ever happen to want to link against installed libraries in a given directory, LIBDIR, you must either use libtool, and specify the full pathname of the library, or use the `-LLIBDIR' flag during linking and do at least one of the following: - add LIBDIR to the `LD_LIBRARY_PATH' environment variable during execution - add LIBDIR to the `LD_RUN_PATH' environment variable during linking - use the `-Wl,--rpath -Wl,LIBDIR' linker flag - have your system administrator add LIBDIR to `/etc/ld.so.conf' See any operating system documentation about shared libraries for more information, such as the ld(1) and ld.so(8) manual pages." While this message should be perfectly clear for many, I don't feel too confident that this /usr/local/lib is the right location (as I'm quite new to this). Anyway, whenever I'm typing make menuselect, app-fax is greyed out as in my opinion, spandsp libriaries have not been found. Maybe, I should have typed something like (as suggested http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk%20T.38) "./configure --prefix=/usr" but I prefer to ask here, as I'm afraid to spoil everything giving wrong input. Which value shall I give to configure, when installing spandsp0.0.6 from source ? Best regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090309/a4dbc4 02/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:27:09 -0500 From: Tilghman Lesher <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Cdr problem To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Friday 06 March 2009 11:24:46 pm Hooman Peiro wrote: > hi, > I'm working with asterisk on a project and I found a problem with cdr_odbc. > As we know, after answering each call a cdr event is raised which is saved > in cdr_csv and cdr_odbc. but here my point is on cdr_odbc. some > information, including start_time and end_time is given by cdr event but > the problem is that these two information(start_time and end_time) is not > getting save in cdr_odbc. I checked the source code and I found that by > default it's not doing so. I need to query these two information, start > time and end time, from cdr_odbc and I need your help. > thanks You are partially incorrect. The start time is indeed stored in the CDR, although the column name is 'calldate'. As for the end time, it can be derived by adding 'duration' (which is in whole seconds) to the 'calldate' column. Another solution that allows for retrieving both columns with their native names (or completely different names, whatever you map it to) is to use cdr_adaptive_odbc in 1.6.0 and higher. -- Tilghman ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:46:51 -0500 From: Tilghman Lesher <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Broken Pipe error while using UpdateConfig command To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Friday 06 March 2009 03:02:30 pm Randy Paries wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Jose P. Espinal <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > I have been working on a little PHP software that uses AMI's > > UpdateConfig command in order to modify some of it's config files. > > > > > > I was working with 'Asterisk 1.4.22.1' and everything was working. > > After upgrading to 'Asterisk 1.4.23.1' I receive a lot of errors of the > > type: > > > > > > ERROR[11505]: utils.c:966 ast_carefulwrite: write() returned error: > > Broken pipe > > > > > > I'm completely sure that I did not modify anything on the PHP script, > > in fact, I test it on the older version of Asterisk mentioned above > > and it still works like a charm. > > > > Can someone point me out about a possible place to start looking for > > this error? > > > > > > NOTE: > > An interesting thing to note is that I sent all the commands that my > > script executes on the AMI to a file (/tmp/debug.txt ) > > > > Then copying all the file content into AMI interface directly ( telnet > > [server_ip] 5038) and it executed all the commands without any problems. > > So is there any news on this issue? > > I am seeing the same thing. I am new to the AGI world and just > starting to do some coding and started getting these errors. > I was not sure if it is something i am doing wrong or not. Yes, it was determined on the bugtracker that the OP was not waiting for Asterisk to return a response, but instead closing the connection prematurely. This explains why when he concatenated the text to the manager port, it all worked correctly. We advised him to use the manager port interactively, instead of pushing the set of commands and closing the port too soon. With current connections, once Asterisk can no longer respond, it assumes that the remote client is no longer interested in interaction and shuts down its processing, as well. This in turn saves server resources, especially when clients do not shut down the connection properly (like when they crash). -- Tilghman ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:55:38 +0100 From: Marco Signorini <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Steve, I was waiting for your answer :-P I started to use your SpanDSP library since some years ago but, unfortunately, my experience was only related to lab or personal use and/or systems with PSTN or BRI cards and low fax volume where it's impossible to have valid statistics. I read the link you provided me and now I'm confident that IAXModem running on the same asterisk box with a PRI board is something I can propose to my customer. There are some other variable I would like to evaluate, like, for example, what type of PRI connection people of this list are using in their fax servers. Thank you for writing SpanDSP and best regards, Marco Signorini ======================= INGEGNI Tech S.r.l. http://www.ingegnitech.com Steve Underwood wrote: > Marco Signorini wrote: > >> Thank you to All People answered me on this subject. >> Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today >> problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong? >> What about other solutions? >> >> > I'm not sure where you got that idea. Most comments about iaxmodem + > HylaFAX are very positive. It does, of course, require a reliable > connection between iaxmodem and the PSTN, but most people set these > things up in a reasonably well controlled environment. There are some > notes at http://www.soft-switch.org/spandsp-soft-fax-performance.html > about the results of serious real world volume testing of iaxmodem. > > Regards, > Steve > > ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:58:22 -0500 From: James Sneeringer <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] How to install spandsp from source in lenny ? To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Olivier <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyway, whenever I'm typing make menuselect, app-fax is greyed out as in my > opinion, spandsp libriaries have not been found. > > Maybe, I should have typed something like (as suggested > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk%20T.38) "./configure > --prefix=/usr" but I prefer to ask here, as I'm afraid to spoil everything > giving wrong input. You can do this, which will put the spandsp library in /usr/lib where "configure" for Asterisk can find it, or you can run Asterisk's configure as "configure --with-spandsp=/usr/local" to tell it to look where you have already installed it. -James ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users End of asterisk-users Digest, Vol 56, Issue 23 ********************************************** _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
