Hi, On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:18:12AM -0500, Jason Parker wrote: > > > How about merging in your changes/improvements/new packages > > > with ATrpms (and automatically later into rpmrepo.org
> > Of course I'd love to contribute my changes to ATrpms. Some > > of the small changes I made, such as adding OSLEC to the DAHDI > > RPMs, might be nice for ATrpms users. I'll whip up some > > patches against the ATrpms sources. > > Alternatively, there's also the RPMS at > > http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/ which seem to have a nice > > spread of options available, > I would love it if some of this were to happen. I am very familiar > with Axel and ATrpms - he has proven countless times that he knows > what he's doing when it comes to this sort of thing. Getting > help/advice from somebody like him would be extremely beneficial. > As far as basing the ATrpms (or others) packages on the AsteriskNOW > packages, if that is something that Axel (or others) wanted to do, I > would be more than willing to help with whatever is needed. The packages at ATrpms try to be as upstream/vanilla/generic as possible, I wouldn't want to base them on a downstream project like AsteriskNOW (I even try to keep any RHEL/Fedora specifics out of them, so people can even rebuild on other rpm platforms). As you wrote in a trimmed part of the mail, for example relying on the downstream of AsteriskNOW resulted in forgetting setting up init files needed for standalone operation. But serving a downstream project is a different beast and worthwhile doing it. Are there any bits in the ATrpms packages that need adjustment/fixing wrt AsteriskNOW? If so is it possible to keep the packages still generic, and FHS/LSB compliant? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpLO1NxnR65j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
