Yes, you make a good point.  Electromagnetic fields are another source of 
ingress, whether from a nearby cell phone or by being located a mile away from 
a 50 KW AM radio transmitter (etc.).

>one does wonder why there's such inadequate shielding 

As a ham radio operator, I can say that has been a question raised about 
consumer electronics in general for many decades, particularly since the advent 
of solid state devices with their low voltage diode detecting capability.  The  
answer, unfortunately, is simple--economics.  If only 1 out of 1000 devices is 
exposed to a situation that results in interference, the manufacture is loathe 
to spend even a nickel to protect against it--especially if the volume is 
large.  Five cents on 1,000,000 products is $50,000.  Depending on the strength 
of the interfering signal, it can take a lot more than five cents to protect 
it.  Cell phones aren't very high power,  The 50 KW transmitter--well that's 
another story.

Wilton
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to