Another satisfied CentOS customer here. CentOS 5.2 running 1.6.0.1 on a Dell 2950 with a Sangoma A104D, call center environment, 20 employees doing outbound dialing and answering queue calls (migrating the other 380 seats next month)
ZERO issues, not a single dropped call reported, no crashes, NADA. pbx01*CLI> core show uptime System uptime: 14 weeks, 6 days, 20 hours, 49 minutes, 50 seconds Last reload: 5 weeks, 6 days, 18 hours, 12 minutes, 11 seconds Our other production servers are about 3 years old, running FC4 and a modified 1.2.4, stable but we reboot nightly, just in case. On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:37 PM, ContactTel Business <li...@contacttel.com>wrote: > “Centos is a much more appropriate distro for production work. Nothing > goes into it until it is known to be rock solid, and update occur much more > slowly. “ > > > > Yes, and that also means newer glib etc can be needed sometimes which are > not YET avail on centos, however if you are not a yum freak and prefer to > control builds, its perfect. Been using centos since ever, and never got any > problems, never.. > > > > > > > > *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: > asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Wilton Helm > *Sent:* April-08-09 12:40 PM > *To:* Asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Best Practice Advice? > > > > >Also, FC10 is out. You should probably grab that first. > > > > Unless you are a strong Linux Guru, I would never recommend a Fedora > release for a production system. I have FC9 here and FC10. It took me > months to eliminate the bugs from FC9, and I still haven't gotten FC10 to > install on the machine I got it for (three months now). Fedora is cutting > edge and puts out a new release probably every six months with less than > usual regard for consistency or stability. I don't know of anything > Asterisk that requires this level of cutting edge technology. While all the > bugs I fought in FC9 are gone, they have been replaced by a whole new spate > of (some still unidentified) bugs. > > > > Centos is a much more appropriate distro for production work. Nothing goes > into it until it is known to be rock solid, and update occur much more > slowly. It wouldn't be too far off base to say that Fedora users are the > beta testers for Centos--not explicitly in terms of versions, but certainly > in terms of features and code base. I'm sure there are other good (maybe > even better) distros for Asterisk, I'm not familiar with all of them. > > Fedora is really at home with someone who is running a personal web server > or media computer or something for a hobby and likes to have the latest of > everything and wants to (or at least is willing to) play with it, get it to > work and help improve it. That isn't the recipe for running a business. > > > > Wilton > > > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users