On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 22:19 +0200, Philipp von Klitzing wrote: > Hi! > > > looks interesting, indeed, but as the O.P. wanted to divert PSTN call, > > one would need chan_dahdi.so or chan_misdn.so/chan_capi.so (If the > > hardware of Fritz is capable of it....) > > "Divert"-ing is a misleading term in this case. As I said, use the new > firmware and register Asterisk to the Fritz!Box as "Internet telephone" > and the OP is ready to go. > > http://www.ip-phone-forum.de/showpost.php?p=1298093&postcount=202 > http://www.ip-phone-forum.de/showthread.php?t=184818&; >
Well, to avoid further confusion, lets check with the O.P. ;-) So Manoj, which case were you refering to: case-1: Incoming VOIP-calls are answered by Fritz, and then forwarded to your own Asterisk. (And for outgoing calls, Asterisk uses Fritz as an VOIP-gateway) case-2 Incoming PSTN/ISDN are answered by Fritz, and then forwarded to your own Asterisk. Incoming VOIP-calls are answered by your own Asterisk. In case-1, Fritz has an ordinairy DSL-modem, and on the lan-side there is an VOIP-pbx, and a FXS interface for a local phone. In case-2 Fritz has on the PSTN/ISDN-line an ordinairy DSL-modem, But also a FXO interface. While on the lan-side there is an VOIP-pbx, and a FXS interface for a local phone. AFAICS, case-1 is do-able, but you don't gain anything with it. case-2 would give you two places for incoming calls (voip & PSTN) But i wonder if the HW would allow that (no fxo) If case-2 is feasable, i'll dash-off for an 7270.... _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
