It was not a conscious decision to use MS-SQL. We were "forced" to use MS-SQL since the "business" rules were on MS-SQL and other apps are using it.
If you think it is not ODBC, then what in your opinion is causing the issue? I though you did mention that in your opinion database might be the culprit... Thanks in advance On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Steve Edwards <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Deepak wrote: > > > BTW,we are using an ODBC connection to Microsoft SQL Server. We are not > > using MySQL. > > > > Would that be a possible cause? > > Probably not the cause, unless there is a bug in ODBC. > > But, it does multiply your support costs. > > Not because of the obvious "you have to pay MS license fees," or "it uses > more resources," or even "I can't ssh into it to fix it for you" but > because you have stepped outside of the "norm" of what people on this list > use so we will not be able to help much. > > If I was to guess, I'd say 99% use MySQL, 1% use PostgreSQL and something > very close to 0% us MSSQL. > > Thanks in advance, > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Steve Edwards [email protected] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST > Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
