It does which is why it was not included in a release code set. The patch could be changed to do an OR type compare for the bridge class. I have changed my implementation to use only user events for everything that I now need so I did not pursue this patch. -- Jim Dickenson mailto:[email protected]
CfMC http://www.cfmc.com/ > From: Benny Amorsen <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:32:11 +0200 > To: Jim Dickenson <[email protected]> > Cc: Asterisk User MailList <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: What is the best way to share extension state > > Jim Dickenson <[email protected]> writes: > >> http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14595 has a patch to add a new class, >> bridge, so you get less events in AMI. This is for 1.6.0.x. It will give you >> an idea of what needs to be changed in order to make the call class of >> messages more granular. > > It's nice to see that work is done to make it more granular. However, > doesn't that break backwards compatibility, in the people who request > call now don't get bridge events? > > The challenge is that eventually every single manager_event will have > its own type... > > Anyway, that's a worry for another time. It's really neat! > > > /Benny > _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
