Hose wrote: > What you say...Dave Fullerton (dfullertaster...@shorelinecontainer.com): > > >> Kevin P. Fleming wrote: >> >>> Hose wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I have a feeling that the issue is between transcoding of ulaw to g.722 >>>> and it's too loud during the transcoding - anyway to adjust the levels? >>>> >>> There was a flaw in Asterisk's G.722 transcoder module that was fixed >>> recently (on May 15, 2009), so any release made after that date should >>> solve your problem. Upgrading to 1.6.0.10 should give you the fix (and >>> the fix should be noted in the ChangeLog for 1.6.0.10 as well). >>> >> It is not in the 1.6.0.10 Changelog nor the 1.6.1.1 Changelog. It is, >> however, in the 1.6.0.11-rc1 Changelog and the 1.6.2.0-beta3 Changelog. >> >> -Dave >> > > Interesting - the one time I didn't bother to upgrade it gets listed as > fixed in the changelog. > > However I did upgrade just now after a break in calls to .10. > Unfortunately it's still the same, but might the change not have been > implemented in .10 according to Dave's notes? > > The workaround at the moment is just to use ulaw and that works (though > obviously without the wonders that is g.722). If it's in the pipline > for .11, I can just hang out until then as I'd prefer not to run an -rc > version. > Even when a loud voice drives the G.722 into trouble, it still sounds better than crappy u-Law. :-)
Only a few lines were changed in the G.722 codec files. You could easily replicate those changes in an older version of Asterisk, if you need to. Steve _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
