Editing my original comment, "linux uname" should have been "linux hostname". Tilghman, can you elaborate a bit more?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tilghman Lesher Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:38 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Host-ID. On Friday 07 August 2009 10:11:23 Thomas Kenyon wrote: > Danny Nicholas wrote: > > AFAIK, host-id is tied to ip address and linux uname, so that's all that > > should matter. > > It's definately not tied to uname, otherwise it'd change every time I > built a new kernel. Basing it on IP address would be extremely foolish, > since most people use one of 3 ranges for their internal network with > servers generally being .1-10 or .250-254, and for external connections > too many people are on dynamic IPs. > > It is appears to be tied to the adapter address of eth0, I just don't > know if the adapter addresses of other interfaces make a difference. Yes, it's based on all of them, and they should always present in the same order. -- Tilghman & Teryl with Peter, Cottontail, Midnight, Thumper, & Johnny (bunnies) and Harry, BB, & George (dogs) _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
