John A. Sullivan III wrote: > <grin> Glad to hear of the improvement - just sorry for us. We'll use > the safest of the remaining options we can think of. Is there a better > way to do what we are trying to do? Thanks - John
No, you've covered the bases pretty well. Unfortunately I think that any other option you use is going to not only stop reinvites from happening, but also stop Asterisk from using the optimized Packet2Packet RTP bridge mode, which will mean more CPU will be used for bridging the media between the endpoints. There have been requests in the past for a direct 'disable reinvite' option that could be set via some method, but I don't think anyone has ever tried to implement it. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: [email protected] Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
