----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Mountifield" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:13 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ooh323 and h323
> In article <f43e89e805474ecdbde144af654e8...@benderd>, > Dovid Bender <[email protected]> wrote: >> Stay away form ooh323. It tends to crash Asterisk. > > Much better to use it and fix any bugs that make Asterisk crash. > If everyone stays away from it, they will never get found and fixed. > > IME, ooh323 is much leaner and cleaner than the other two H323 > implementations, as it doesn't rely on external libraries of > specific versions, and doesn't have a load of C++ stuff to call > them. > I would love for some one to fix it. Not sure how many people out there really know h323 and code in C. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
