Doesnt WAV49 have worse quality than WAV? Or am I wrong? On more info, I've tested it on calls using alaw, gsm, g729, and in all the recording has poor quality.
Tzafrir answered me talking about a debian patch for this issue, does anyone know where to find it? 2009/10/6 Danny Nicholas <[email protected]> > I doubt AGI is the issue. You can verify this by setting up a context to > record a call without AGI. I’d try using the WAV49 format instead of > regular WAV. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Kim Delevati > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:35 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality > > > > Hi. I'm using the Monitor command to record outgoing calls through SIP, but > the quality is very poor, MUCH worse than the call itself who many times is > perfect. I can barely understand anything thats said. > > Im using Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on a Ubuntu Server 8.10, on a Pentium R 2ghz > with 1gb DDR2. > > That also happens if I use the Record command. I'm using Monitor inside an > AGI file, could that be the problem? Or do you think its something else? > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona > Register Now: http://www.astricon.net > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
