The hardware drivers do seem to be migrating to 2.6. On the other hand ztdummy has seen no love in awhile. For our environment it is a better choice (limited slots, 3.3v instead of 5v, etc).
I'm no kernel programmer, but I've been working on at least clearing the compile errors and loading of ztdummy. The warnings interrupts were easy enough. The unknown symbols has been a bit more baffling (usb-uhci must be a module, changes to usb-uhci?). I'll likely build the solution either way for conferencing, but if the company wants a commercial solution, I need to find one that actually works. Thanks for the feedback, Dan -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy McNamara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] [OT] Commercial conferencing solution? Dan Austin wrote: >The only short term issue I see with * for this is we are standardized >on platform where Digium cards are not an option, and ztdummy and >zaprtc cannot be loaded (2.6 kernels). > > > Mark has taken a stab at fixing zaptel to be compatible with the 2.6 kernel. Why don't you test it to see if it works? Then you can report your results back to the community. You should have at least an X100P in any box you plan on doing conferencing on, just so you can ensure of a solid interrupt Jeremy McNamara _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
