thanx again
chris
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #2506 - 15 msgs Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:10:40 -0600
Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. RE: People detected as fax machines (Don Pobanz)
2. Re: People detected as fax machines (TC)
3. RE: * For Call Center (C. Maj)
4. Re: People detected as fax machines (Andy Powell)
5. Re: ultra-cheap asterisk box ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
6. Cisco FXO as PSTN gateway (updated request for assistance) (Fran Boon)
7. Credit Card Terminal (Christopher J. Wolff)
8. Re: Disturbing trend of * production boxes that
shouldn't be (David Burr)
9. Re: People detected as fax machines (Andrew Thompson)
10. RE: asterisk.org webpage (David Mynatt)
11. RE: ultra-cheap asterisk box (David Mynatt)
12. RE: * For Call Center (Sean Cheesman)
13. Free Message Signaling (reseaux)
14. Re: ultra-cheap asterisk box (Nicolas Gudino)
--__--__--
Message: 1 From: Don Pobanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] People detected as fax machines Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:41:01 -0600 Organization: Hastings Utilities Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:42 AM, Iain Stevenson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... >Is there any way to stop * even considering an > incoming > call on a line as a fax call? > Sure, just don't have exten => fax..... in the same context (or included context).
> Iain > -- Don Pobanz
--__--__--
Message: 2 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:53:08 -0800 From: TC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] People detected as fax machines To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think this is a MAROR bug in the new dsp.c routines, recompile using the old dsp stuff by changing the makefile and set OLD_DSP_ROUTINES ----- Original Message ----- From: "Iain Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 8:41 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] People detected as fax machines
>
> A caller to me was this afternoon detected as a fax machine:
>
> Jan 15 15:31:17 NOTICE[41997]: File chan_zap.c, Line 3564 (zt_read): Fax
> detected, but no fax extension
>
> ... and then redirected to voicemail. An extract from extensions.conf is
> attached below. Is there any way to stop * even considering an incoming
> call on a line as a fax call?
>
> Iain
>
>
>
> bell]
>
> include => mailboxes
>
> include => day|07:55-23:00
> include => night
>
> exten => t,1,Voicemail2,100
> exten => t,2,Hangup
>
> [day]
>
> ; set music on hold for parked calls
>
> exten => s,1,setmusiconhold,default
> exten => s,2,responsetimeout,20
>
> ; ring SIP for 20 seconds
>
> exten => s,3,Dial,sip/cisco&sip/cisco1&sip/cisco2&sip/cisco3|20|tT
>
> ;if nobody answers tell them how to use the voicemail system.
> ;
> exten => s,4,Background,vmprompt
> exten => s,5,Voicemail2,100
> exten => s,6,Hangup
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--__--__--
Message: 3 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:50:53 -0500 (EST) From: "C. Maj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] * For Call Center Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, mattf waxed:
8<'s
> There is a group of Asterisk users that decided to modify the code of
> Asterisk to try to make it a predictive dialer, called shady_dial I believe,
> but I haven't heard anything about it lately.
http://shadydial.sourceforge.net/
Lots of recent updates made in CVS, and it works with the latest and greatest * CVS, too. No screen pops yet, but that is the next step. Call results are simply logged in the phone, which is pretty sloppy since it resides in the agent hangup function.
Francois Lambert posted some time ago on -dev that his company had worked on a predictive dialer with answering machine detection. Said they hacked * code a little, too, and since it's GPL I would be interested in seeing it.
--Chris
--
Chris Maj <cmaj_hat_freedomcorpse_hot_info> Pronunciation Guide: Maj == May Fingerprint: 43D6 799C F6CF F920 6623 DC85 C8A3 CFFE F0DE C146
--__--__--
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:54:59 +0100 From: "Andy Powell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] People detected as fax machines Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't have a fax connected to * then create and exten:
exten =3D> fax,1,Goto(day,s,1)
I had the same today... :/
Andy
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 15/01/2004 at 16:41 Iain Stevenson wrote:
>A caller to me was this afternoon detected as a fax machine: > >Jan 15 15:31:17 NOTICE[41997]: File chan_zap.c, Line 3564 (zt_read): Fax >detected, but no fax extension > >... and then redirected to voicemail. An extract from extensions.conf is >attached below. Is there any way to stop * even considering an incoming >call on a line as a fax call? > > Iain > > > >bell] > >include =3D> mailboxes > >include =3D> day|07:55-23:00 >include =3D> night > >exten =3D> t,1,Voicemail2,100 >exten =3D> t,2,Hangup > >[day] > >; set music on hold for parked calls > >exten =3D> s,1,setmusiconhold,default >exten =3D> s,2,responsetimeout,20 > >; ring SIP for 20 seconds > >exten =3D> s,3,Dial,sip/cisco&sip/cisco1&sip/cisco2&sip/cisco3|20|tT > >;if nobody answers tell them how to use the voicemail system. >; >exten =3D> s,4,Background,vmprompt >exten =3D> s,5,Voicemail2,100 >exten =3D> s,6,Hangup >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--__--__--
Message: 5 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:55:09 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ultra-cheap asterisk box From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's not what I would want to depend on day in and day out. I know that you can buy Dell PowerEdge SC400 servers for $299 with HDD, memory, and either a celeron or p4, depending on what day of the week it is. I'd put my name on the Dell based solution before the white box solution for the same money.
--Mike
> hi all > > what about this... > I just put together a box on a web shop (komplett.no) that will cost me > NOK ~1850 (� 216) plus a small �50 drive and cables, so say �300. This > consists of a cheap MB with a duron 1400, 256MB SDRAM and two HFC-PCI > cards (if capijod will finish off the zaptel-driver soon). This is all > in a cheap PC case. > > What do you think? Should this be doable? as a product? With only IP > phones and potentially a fax solution? any ideas? > > thanks > > roy > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
--__--__--
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:04:48 +0000
From: Fran Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco FXO as PSTN gateway (updated request for assistance)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been compiling information on this configuration onto the Wiki: http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cisco+FXO
I can call out to the PSTN just fine, but inbound calls all appear in my default [bogon-calls] context, not in [pstn-incoming]
Can anyone help me locate why? (Config files are on the Wiki)
I have done a packet sniff & decoded using Ethereal-0.10.0, but this doesn't tell me a great deal - I just see the rejection message: y.y.y.y x.x.x.x INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 x.x.x.x y.y.y.y Status: 100 Trying x.x.x.x y.y.y.y Status: 503 Service Unavailable y.y.y.y x.x.x.x Request: ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
(resent as retested with 0.7.1 & the addition of autocreatepeer=yes)
Thanks a lot, Fran.
--__--__--
Message: 7 From: "Christopher J. Wolff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:13:52 -0700 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Credit Card Terminal Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have a Hypercom T7P swipe card terminal sitting on a dedicated G711ulaw port. The Hypercom operates at either 1200 or 2400bps. I get about a 50% success rate when I try to authorize cards. On this same G711ulaw port, I have a fax machine with a 100% success rate operating at 9600bps. Any suggestions on how to change *, ATA186, or SIPURA SPA-2000 to enhance the card terminals ability to process would be appreciated.
Regards, Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO Broadband Laboratories, Inc. http://www.bblabs.com
--__--__--
Message: 8 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:23:45 -0700 From: David Burr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Disturbing trend of * production boxes that shouldn't be Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how do you spell Teleecooomm again?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >>Gary Franczyk >>Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:37 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Basic Asterisk capabilities question >> >> >>Whaaa?? So, to allow 24+ lines of dial in access, how would I >>configure it? >> >>Would I need to purchase or lease a voice-over-ip box to >>connect our T1 or phone lines into? And then from there send >>the VOIP to the linux/Asterisk box for recording? >> >>(forgive me, Im new to telephony, but I need to make this work) :-) >> >> > >This is a disturbing trend....people who don't know much about Asterisk >and/or Linux and/or telephony who "Need to make these things work" or >"need to know how to update [their] production box installation...sorry >I don't know Linux at all". > >Asterisk is great, but to maintain it and especially to repair things >when they've gone wrong, you need to know what you're doing. Its your >job (the people I'm talking about know who they are), so do as you wish, >but I sure would install something I know little or nothing about and >call it production. > >Daryl G. Jurbala >BMPC Network Operations >Tel (NY): +1 917 477 0468 x235 >Tel (MI): +1 616 608 0004 x235 >Tel (UK): +44 208 792 6813 x235 >Fax: +1 508 526 8500 >INOC-DBA: 26412*DGJ > >PGP Key: http://www.introspect.net/pgp >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > >
--__--__--
Message: 9 From: "Andrew Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] People detected as fax machines Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:28:03 -0500 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Iain Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 11:41 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] People detected as fax machines
>
> A caller to me was this afternoon detected as a fax machine:
>
> Jan 15 15:31:17 NOTICE[41997]: File chan_zap.c, Line 3564 (zt_read): Fax
> detected, but no fax extension
>
> ... and then redirected to voicemail. An extract from extensions.conf is
> attached below. Is there any way to stop * even considering an incoming
> call on a line as a fax call?
>
Search the archives... google for: site:lists.digium.com fax detection
You're looking for something about OLD_DSP_ROUTINES
It's been discussed several times now. ----- Andrew Thompson http://aktzero.com/ Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
--__--__--
Message: 10 From: "David Mynatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk.org webpage Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:38:53 -0600 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get 'Access Denied'... Can it be downloaded zip or tar ball?
Dave
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philipp von Klitzing Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk.org webpage
Hi!
> for new users, finding asterisk info is unneccesary troublesome. the > asterisk.org page has very little information about the product and > using google for 'asterisk' is like using google for 'linux'. you get > all too many hits that has nothing to do with the product. perhaps the
> asterisk.org page at least should point to voip-info.org? or perhaps > it's time someone rewrote the page?
Here's my little attempt to adjust the README file: http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000846
Cheers, Philipp
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--__--__--
Message: 11 From: "David Mynatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ultra-cheap asterisk box Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:38:53 -0600 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you wanting to make a pre-built * box, with hardware to connect a single dial line and one traditional phone, or.. ?
Dave
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 11:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ultra-cheap asterisk box
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of=20 > Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 11:08 AM > To: Asterisk Users > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ultra-cheap asterisk box >=20 >=20 > hi all >=20 > what about this... > I just put together a box on a web shop (komplett.no) that > will cost me NOK ~1850 (=88 216) plus a small =8850 drive and=20 > cables, so say =88300. This consists of a cheap MB with a duron=20 > 1400, 256MB SDRAM and two HFC-PCI cards (if capijod will=20 > finish off the zaptel-driver soon). This is all in a cheap PC case. >=20 > What do you think? Should this be doable? as a product? With > only IP phones and potentially a fax solution? any ideas?
I've got one system with 10 IP phones + SIP term + 2 FXS + 4 FXO running on a P700 with 256 MB RAM. It works just fine, and the CPU is rarely over 40%.
Sounds like that box will work from a capability standpoint. Daryl G. Jurbala BMPC Network Operations Tel (NY): +1 917 477 0468 x235 Tel (MI): +1 616 608 0004 x235 Tel (UK): +44 208 792 6813 x235 Fax: +1 508 526 8500 INOC-DBA: 26412*DGJ
PGP Key: http://www.introspect.net/pgp=20 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--__--__--
Message: 12 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] * For Call Center Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:48:17 -0500 From: "Sean Cheesman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually he found it in the dumpster after the police threw it out following a bust! Does anyone want to send a dollar to Mr. Happy?!
-----Original Message----- From: C. Maj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 12:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * For Call Center
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Steve waxed:
> On Thursday 15 January 2004 12:03 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > sounds like one of those pesky auto dialers the simpsons make fun=20 > > of. >=20 > It sure does...
The AT-5000 was Prof. Frink's first patent, and it was "designed to alert children of snow days and such." I think Homer bought it at one of those pesky police auctions, you know, the ones where the liberty and freedom loving US government says your property is guilty of a crime and theirs to sell...
But don't forget that Prof. Frink went on to invent such wonders as the Flying Motorcycle, a Matter Transporter, and the Frinkahedron:
http://www.internerd.com/frink.retired/frinkv.3/inventions/
--Chris
--=20
Chris Maj <cmaj_hat_freedomcorpse_hot_info> Pronunciation Guide: Maj =3D=3D May Fingerprint: 43D6 799C F6CF F920 6623 DC85 C8A3 CFFE F0DE C146
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--__--__--
Message: 13 From: reseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:16:10 +0100 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Free Message Signaling Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi To ALL
i have made an application for billing a traffic but i have strange problem
with free message from Telco provider because when dial the number and Telco
reply "The customer have change number..." i dont receive a connect so i cant
listen nothing... Yes is right from PRI dont receive a "connect" signal but
how can listen the mex?
Thanks in advance
Dimi
PS: Happy New Year
--__--__--
Message: 14 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ultra-cheap asterisk box From: Nicolas Gudino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: House Internet S.R.L. Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:52:43 -0300 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 14:31, Chris Albertson wrote: > I'm looking to do about the same thing, build very low cost > systems. (I'm looking at putting Asterisk at some > non-profit organizations.) but one thing you can't make > a compromise on is reliabilty. It has to work and keep working > for years to come. I was able to keep the price of a new PC > to about $300 ad still use an ASUS mainboard and an AMD XP2600+ > The trick is to add absolutly nothing not needed. No floppy, > no CDROM so you can run off a 200W P/S. Next I'll experiment > with a notebook sized IDE disk drives and to see if _underclocking_ > the CPU reduces it's power comsumption enough that we can save > one fan.
I'm also looking at this. I was thinking on a system without a hard drive, booting from a pendrive or flashdive. I want to avoid moving parts, they always break or get dirty and are noisy. If there are other people working on this, we might join efforts and work together and came up with a small linux version with asterisk included, that can boot from a pendrive or a cdrom.
-- Nicolas Gudino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> House Internet S.R.L.
--__--__--
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
End of Asterisk-Users Digest
_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE online virus check for your PC here, from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
