On Wednesday 21 October 2009 15:16:31 Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Danny Nicholas wrote: > > Not my cup of tea, but I think I'd be trying an ODBC connection to reduce > > some overhead here. > > [snip] > > Does that reduce overhead or add it? Seems that direct mysql-client code > should be more efficient than adding ODBC in the middle...
In this case, it would reduce overhead. The example he provides creates a unique connection for every channel, which is massive overkill for MySQL. Only Sybase and MS SQL Server require a distinct connection for each live query. MySQL can very effectively run multiple queries on a single connection. -- Tilghman Lesher Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer twitter: Corydon76 | IRC: Corydon76-dig (Freenode) Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
