Hi Alex, i'm not sure to understand. Asterisk does support SIP INFO, so why doesn't Asterisk add the INFO Method in the 200OK Response? richard
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Alex Balashov <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it's correct. Asterisk needs to advertise its support of that > method in order for the other UA to be willing to send messages with > that request method to it. > > Coco Richard wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> In the INVITE from my SIP provider to Asterisk i can see that the >> Allow Header includes an INFO Method, but Asterisk replies a 200 OK >> with an Allow Header without INFO Method. But in the RFC3261 (20.5) >> you can read: >> >> "All methods, including ACK and CANCEL, understood by the UA MUST be >> included in the list of methods in the Allow header field, when >> present. " >> >> My SIP provider seems to refuse to send SIP INFO DTMF and releases the >> call, because in 200 OK from * there is no INFO Method in the Allow >> Header. >> >> Is that correct. >> >> thx >> richard >> >> _______________________________________________ >> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- >> >> asterisk-users mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > -- > Alex Balashov - Principal > Evariste Systems > Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ > Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 > Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
