On Wednesday 23 December 2009 01:31:04 Zhang Shukun wrote:
> 2009/12/23 Tilghman Lesher <[email protected]>:
> > On Tuesday 22 December 2009 23:08:36 Rob Hillis wrote:
> >> On 12/23/09 12:23, Russell Bryant wrote:
> >> >>> Wasn't this scheduled for 1.6.2?
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't believe so, but I could be mistaken. It's certainly not in
> >> >> 1.6.2 as best I can tell from looking over the source code :-)
> >> >
> >> > Nope, it's not in 1.6.2.  It went into trunk after the 1.6.2 feature
> >> > freeze.
> >>
> >> Wouldn't that imply that it will be in 1.6.3?
> >
> > What was once going to be 1.6.3 is now going to be 1.8.  There is no
> > 1.6.3 in the planning stages at this time.
>
> why the edition jump from 1.6.2 to 1.8 , what's the reason? the number
> of the edition always
>
> confuse me.

http://blogs.asterisk.org/2009/11/10/asterisk-project-update-astricon-2009/

-- 
Tilghman Lesher
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
twitter: Corydon76 | IRC: Corydon76-dig (Freenode)
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org

_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to