On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:06:17PM -0300, Andrew Latham wrote: > I have worked on many snom phones over the years.... I have never had > a snom phone go bad...
I have had about 10 in the last 12-18 months, I had 1 with a fault hand set plug - the reseller replaced it. Other wise they have been great. > > I have repaired stuck screens and overheated sticky bits but all in > all snom are great phones. I recently showed my personal phone to > some people including a VoIP engineer that fell in love with my snom > 360... It has scratches and dents from use and abuse but the real > shocker was when I turned the phone over and showed them the date of > manufacture ... 2004... > > I am working with some Polycom phones right now. They look ok. I > don't hear any "better speaker" that people talk about. They are > troublesome to administrate or provision as a single phone. provision the snom is a "pain" to setup - well you have to do a lot of work, but its work while - lots of documentation on the snom site on mass distribution - makes life simple I would recommend it for anything more than 3 phones (all you need is a deamon provided by snom written in perl and a http server) [snip] >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
