On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:48:53PM -0500, sean darcy wrote: > [email protected] wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 23:11 -0600, Karl Fife wrote: > >> Appears completely resolved! > >> No more home-spun patches! > >> Thanks! > >> -K > >> > > It's *not* fixed here: > > DAHDI Version: 2.2.1 Echo Canceller: MG2 > > > > But as is depressingly the 'norm' for Asterisk it comes back to bitching > > about hardware 'buy an expensive Digium echo machine instead of a cheap > > one' rather than the fact that the core of Asterisk is rotten, buggy and > > the fix usually comes in the form of a developer arguing that it's > > somebody else's issue. > > > > Really - if Asterisk is 'The future of telephony' I can only assume that > > statement comes from the late 1800's. If you like echo, flaky > > connections, intermittent service and partially working DTMF coupled > > with a hefty hardware price tag then hey ho - Asterisk is your man.... > > Nice try, be great when it's finished. > > > > > > Sigh. > > OK you don't like asterisk - sorry. Obviously some other software works > better for you. I'm glad. > > For at least some of us, asterisk works extremely well in demanding > environments. But not perfectly. So the collegial help from the mailing > list and bug spotting is quite important. > > Sorry you don't want to participate.
FWIW, I also consider Asterisk's behaviour here buggy. http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-voip/asterisk/trunk/debian/patches/dahdi-fxsks-hookstate?view=markup -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[email protected] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[email protected] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[email protected]/tzafrir -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
