On 08:48, Mon 15 Feb 10, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > On Monday 15 February 2010 03:37:24 Rob Hillis wrote: > > On 02/15/10 20:00, Randy R wrote: > > > Olle, this may be a stupid question, but shouldn't a native santitize > > > function be urgently added to the code base in all versions or change > > > the dialplan comp?ler to ignore dangerous characters? > > > > Whilst I agree with this, the unfortunate attitude we seem to get from > > Digium on most of these issues is "you can already do this in dialplan, > > therefore we don't need to invest any effort in it." The fact that a > > workaround may be quite difficult to implement properly doesn't come in > > to it. The most obvious example of this one is the deprecation and > > removal of chan_agent without any sort of replacement being introduced > > because "it's already possible to do in the dialplan". > > Uh, chan_agent has been neither removed nor deprecated.
He probably means AgentCallbackLogin -- Michiel van Baak [email protected] http://michiel.vanbaak.eu GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x71C946BD "Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are both called users?" -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
