On 02/18/10 09:00, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > >17 feb 2010 kl. 19.12 skrev Joseph: > >> Does the sort order matter in sip.conf file? >> I know sort order might effect: >> allow=ulaw >> allow=alaw >> >> but does it matter where I place: insecure=invite ? >> >> The reason I'm asking is that I've loaded almost two identical (sip.conf and >> extension.conf) files on the same asterisk server and with one set >> insecure=invite is working correctly. >> When I load the second set of dial plan (sip.conf and extension.conf) >> insecure=invite is not taking effect. >> I get: >> "... username mismatch, have <4>, digest has <pstn-4444> >> handle_request_invite: Failed to authenticate user "KMIEC J" >> >> Someone have mentioned that sort order in sip.conf might effect the way it >> works. > >No, where you place the insecure=invite in the device specification does not >matter. > >/O
But for some reason or the other it "insecure=invite" works in one sip.conf but not the other; that is what puzzling me. I've compered two sip.conf with "meld" and they are identical except some registration context and numbers. -- Joseph -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
