On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 19:36 -0400, bruce bruce wrote:
> Here are result of dahdi_test:
>
>
> [r...@ip-10-251-123-3 ~]# dahdi_test
> Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy...
> 99.725% 96.018% 99.532% 91.934% 99.923% 99.923% 99.628% 99.434%
> -434.763% 99.239% 93.770% 99.141% 99.822% 91.232% 99.727% 93.770%
> 99.726% -403.227% 98.069% 98.458% 95.136% 98.749% 91.229% 87.622%
> 98.554% 93.282% -407.620% 94.650% 96.308% 98.750% 96.993% 93.478%
> 94.063% 93.381% 61.745% -379.400% 99.628% 99.921% 99.142% 96.797%
> 98.457% 99.337% 87.909% 95.141% -396.880% 99.531% 99.923% 99.921%
> 91.035% 96.408% 91.916% 90.255% -402.153% 81.079% 74.534% 96.212%
>
>
> What can one tell from these?
>
Only that your timing source sucks. You need 99.9% or higher if you
want a stable system. I have servers with dahdi_dummy that never go
below 99.7% accuracy. You really need to check your timing source.-- Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V. Carlos Chávez Prats Director de Tecnología +52-55-91169161 ext 2001
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
