On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Vieri wrote:

> I ran the following and it supposedly updated my system time while ntpd 
> was running:
>
> # ps ax | fgrep ntp
> 1256 ?        Ss     0:00 /usr/sbin/ntpd -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -u ntp:ntp
> 1623 pts/14   S+     0:00 fgrep ntp
>
> # ntpdate -b -u pool.ntp.org
> 26 Apr 19:41:18 ntpdate[2791]: step time server 163.117.131.239 offset 
> 0.142263 sec

>From the ntpdate man page:

        -u     Direct ntpdate to use an unprivileged port for outgoing packets.
               This is most useful when behind a firewall that blocks  incoming
               traffic  to  privileged  ports, and you want to synchronise with
               hosts beyond the firewall. Note that the -d option  always  uses
               unprivileged ports.

So ntpdate does not try and use 123 -- which is in use by ntpd.

Does:

        sudo netstat -a -n -p | grep ntpd

show something like:

      udp        0      0 192.168.0.xx:123        0.0.0.0:*      1693/ntpd
      udp        0      0 127.0.0.1:123           0.0.0.0:*      1693/ntpd
      udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:123             0.0.0.0:*      1693/ntpd
      udp6       0      0 fe80::222:68ff:fe36:123 :::*           1693/ntpd
      udp6       0      0 ::1:123                 :::*           1693/ntpd
      udp6       0      0 :::123                  :::*           1693/ntpd
      unix  2      [ ]         DGRAM                    6635     1693/ntpd

-- 
Thanks in advance,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Edwards       [email protected]      Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
Newline                                              Fax: +1-760-731-3000

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to