Do you see the creation of a "buyer beware" repository that host deprecated features (like agentcallbacklogin) that aren't happy for current release but might be desired for backward compatibility? Or is that just a "port" that we would bring forward ourselves outside of the norm?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tilghman Lesher Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 8:36 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Getting presence working in 1.6.2 On Friday 07 May 2010 08:25:17 Danny Nicholas wrote: > In which future release of Asterisk are we (since it is open-source, we > theoretically have "some" control) going to stop renaming and deprecating > features? I doubt that will ever happen. In the case of callcounter, that's not a rename, anyway; it's merely a reflection of the fact that people want devicestate, yet limiting calls some some arbitrary number is the legacy interface (and a bad one, at that). We will always reserve the right to make improvements. Sometimes, that means deprecating poor interfaces. -- Tilghman Lesher Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer twitter: Corydon76 | IRC: Corydon76-dig (Freenode) Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
