On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:09:30PM +0200, Randy R wrote:
> Has anyone mentioned Teraterm in this thread? I know it's very old but
> I also know it worked well with XP.
Teraterm only supports the old, insecure and much less capable ssh1
protocol, IIRC. Many recent SSHDs disable ssh1 support nowadays. Don't
use it.
> I preferred it over Putty, but I
> haven't used Putty in years either. Nowadays, I use mostly Mac with
> occasional virtual XP - and the OS X terminal is great. It's a little
> surprising that no one has written a more modern version of something
> like Teraterm, but maybe the majority of Windows users don't do SSH?
What's wrong with putty?
Oh, and: see my previous link for msysgit.
> The fact is that when I mention SFTP to them (we don't do ftp at all
> usually) I can hear the crickets over the phone.
(SFTP is one of the "new" features of the SSH2 protocol)
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[email protected]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[email protected]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[email protected]/tzafrir
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
