On 07/05/2010 09:02 AM, Kristijan Vrban wrote: > Hello, i just had some fax abortions because of some packet loss. so i > startet to examine in the pcap recording > from the res_fax_digium, if the T.38 EC mode redundancy was really > used. So i watched into it, and compared it > with a t.38 pcap from spandsp (same asterisk setup, but with app_fax) > and i see differences in t38.error_recovery > (error-recovery: secondary-ifp-packets) > With spandsp here are three items, and with res_fax_digium zero items. > (t38.secondary_ifp_packets) > I this the the t.38 error correction? I ask this questions, because > the fax for asterisk admin manual, there are no > information about the T.38 error correction, and if i better use > Redundancy or FEC.
Please contact Digium Support with questions about Fax For Asterisk's operations and features. Thanks. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users