Hi Steve, Interesting... I'm not sure! My copy of the original indications.conf had 400+17, and looking at the wiki it's the same there also http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20indications%20defaul t
I tested 400*17 and it made a difference, but I still think 420+400 sounds much closer to it... if there's any other Australian users who have customised the tones and want to try it out let me know what you think or what tones you're using. I have just been thinking perhaps the main advantage of letting the SIP device generate it's own indications is lower bandwidth use, for my setup this isn't really an issue, and if I can figure out how to directly modify the tones in the Cisco 7940 I'll have a go at it. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Davies > Sent: Sunday, 25 January 2004 3:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Indications > > > > On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Christopher Lee wrote: > > > The original indications has 400+17/400, but I find that sounds more > like > > two beeps (which could possibly be confused with the Australian > > congestion/busy tones). > > Shouldn't it be 400*17? > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
