16 mar 2011 kl. 14.13 skrev Benny Amorsen: > "Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> writes: > >> Why do you need a Local channel to do this? If extension 234 exists in >> some context, the Dial() statement in that extension can dial >> SIP/234-foo and SIP/234-bar itself. > > Good point. > > It can be a bit of fun keeping track of the phones when they are > added to or removed from queues, and the owner expects both of them to be > added/removed at the same time. It is still doable without Local channels. > > Once you need to do manipulation of calls before passing them on to the > phone (change callerid individually, handle tT options etc.), Local is > unavoidable, but at that point multiple registrations would not work > either.
We also need to adopt SIP headers depending on device - so we need a dial per device, not one combined. /O -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
