Based on the following URL, it seems that CallWeaver may not still be an active project??
http://www.callweaver.org/blog/20 >From a security standpoint, I would usually expect it is safer to be with an >active project, than a dead one. Otherwise who is going to patch >vulnerabilities? Not me. I'm not a software developer. - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks P: 505.327.7300 . From: Steve Totaro [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:11 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] What is the most stable version of asterisk? On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Douglas Mortensen <[email protected]> wrote: 1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8? Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks Inc CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+ Linux+, Network+, Server+ . www.impalanetworks.com P: (505) 327-7300 F: (505) 327-7545 Callweaver? http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver. I believe they forked somewhere in the 1.2 release. Many features ahead of Asterisk. Although I didn't see anything on FreeSwitch stating anything anything about deadlocking, I know that was one of the main reasons for BKW, as seasoned asterisk developer and folks to start from scratch. That and the hybrid dual license in Asterisk. http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Asterisk.pdf Read the whole piece. I know it isn't Asterisk but BKW who contributed and I believe is still helping Asterisk Besides, I feel that FreeSwitch is the most stable. I like 1.2 so I went with Callweaver for many installations. Thanks, Steve Totaro -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
