On 11-04-11 10:26 AM, Effie Mouzeli wrote:
This may lead to some buggy clients not to accept the call (with 488),
but I've noticed some cases where a callee was behind NAT,
an INVITE with one video codec would me forwarded properly
to the callee, but another INVITE with 3 video codecs, would
never reach the callee, probably because it was never forwarded by
the router (I still haven't been able to figure this out).
The code you are talking about underwent a complete rewrite [1] and has
already been merged into trunk[2]. Not that it helps you now, but you
may want to try testing with trunk (will become Asterisk 1.10) and see
if you have the same issues.
This is one of the major milestones for Asterisk 1.10, and I'm sure any
feedback in testing will be much appreciated.
[1] https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Media+Architecture+Proposal
[2] http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=revision&revision=306010
--
Paul Belanger
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer
twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode)
Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
