On Wednesday 04 May 2011, vip killa wrote: > Honestly Digium's Asterisk is not a quality project. Though it has lead the > way in innovative open-source VoIP, it's a flawed and chaotic project. > Hence, I refuse to pay Digium.
Don't worry. You can always get your money refunded if it breaks -- and you even get to keep all the pieces. > Digium seems to make a "bazillion" dollars > off of these flaws by selling commercial support/addons anyway... so that > should be worth some bad karma points. Other people seem to manage fine. Have you considered that *you* might be the problem here? (For my part, I'm actually surprised that nobody came up with a proper protocol for encapsulating the stream of zeros and ones that make up a fax transmission but rely on the precise timing inherent with a circuit-switched network, into something more suitable for sending over a packet-switched network. That would have fixed it good and proper.) -- AJS Answers come *after* questions. -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
